NEWS [and] Perspective
BUT FIRST! Mikki Willis's 2023 film The Great Awakening arrived, not with fanfare, but with a quiet resonance, a timely exploration of the human condition in the aftermath of a world irrevocably changed. This is not merely a film; it’s a whispered conversation, a vulnerable unveiling of the anxieties and hopes that simmer beneath the surface of our collective experience. It dares to ask the difficult questions: How do we reconnect after a period of profound isolation? How do we rebuild the bridges that have been fractured by circumstance and fear? And, perhaps most importantly, how do we find solace and strength in a world that often feels fragmented and uncertain? The Great Awakening delves into the heart of these inquiries with an unflinching honesty, exposing the raw nerves of our shared vulnerability. It’s a film that invites introspection, not judgment, and offers a space for contemplation, not condemnation. It reminds us, with a gentle but insistent voice, that even in the face of adversity, the human spirit endures, and the yearning for connection remains our most fundamental drive. It is an revealing as it is predictable, and as such it is a prefect compliment to the current, unapologetically-nostalgic zeitgeist.
/Current Ledger *Q1, 2025|
The American Public Ledger is a news website that covers topics related to financial markets, economic policy, and government actions in the United States. It focuses on providing information about public finance, government spending, and fiscal policies, and often includes analysis of economic trends and political developments. The site aims to give readers a clear and accessible understanding of how public finance and policy decisions affect both individuals and businesses. In a personal reflection, the founder discusses the site's origins, emphasizing its role as a living document of history and a testament to the resilience of the nation. American Public Ledger is an online platform that offers concise annual and quarterly reports, aiming to inform citizens about current events, documentaries, and various resources. The platform's mission is to provide bite-sized, accessible information to foster a more informed public.
As the world hurtles into 2025, the intersection of domestic political shifts, international relations, and economic stability has never seemed so precarious. The United States, under the newly elected President Donald Trump, finds itself at a crossroads where foreign policy, national identity, and the very fabric of democracy itself are in flux. Trump’s return to power—a historic political comeback that shocked the nation and the world—has already ignited fierce debates over what this means for the United States’ relationships with key international allies and adversaries, as well as the state of domestic political and racial tensions.
The War in Gaza and Global Diplomacy
The international stage has been dominated by the ongoing war in Gaza, which continues to exacerbate tensions in the Middle East and spark violent protests and diplomatic fallout around the globe. The U.S. response to the conflict has been sharply divided, with Trump’s administration firmly backing Israel, while many American citizens and members of Congress have voiced support for a more neutral or even pro-Palestinian stance. This division is compounded by rising anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in various parts of the world, and a growing international call for a more nuanced, humanitarian approach to resolving the Middle East conflict. For President Trump, this provides a unique challenge to balance domestic political pressures with his foreign policy imperatives. In his early statements, Trump reaffirmed America’s strong commitment to Israel, but as the war rages on, it’s clear that the U.S.’s role in the region will require careful diplomatic navigation.
GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
Sanctions and Trade Wars: The New World Order
The shift in American foreign policy under Trump is not just limited to the Middle East. His presidency has ushered in a new era of aggressive trade policies and sanctions, particularly targeting major powers like China, Canada, and Mexico. Trump’s hardline stance on trade is designed to confront perceived economic threats head-on. His administration has imposed stringent tariffs on Chinese imports, exacerbating tensions in an already fragile global trade system. The consequences are profound: supply chains are disrupted, global markets are volatile, and companies are left scrambling to adjust. Likewise, his approach to Canada and Mexico—once considered friendly neighbors and trading partners—has taken a hostile turn with new sanctions levied against both countries, aimed at forcing compliance with Trump’s protectionist policies. These measures, while politically expedient in the short term, risk long-term economic instability, particularly in North America where trade agreements like NAFTA (renegotiated into the USMCA) are now on shaky ground.
Trump’s Early Controversies: A Divisive Leadership Style
From the outset of his second term, Trump’s rhetoric and actions have sparked outrage and controversy, highlighting a deeply divided America. Early on, Trump made waves with statements that seemed to disregard the delicate balance of diplomatic engagement and domestic unity. His controversial assertion that the United States would “RENAME the Gulf of Mexico” to "the Gulf of America" was seen by many as an indication of his desire to reinstate the Monroe Doctrine and an aggressive, protectionist foreign policy that could alienate allies in the Western Hemisphere.
His remarks on domestic policy have been equally alarming. Trump’s insistence on eliminating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) training programs, which have become a cornerstone of progressive corporate and governmental initiatives, is a direct challenge to the growing movement for racial and social justice in America. These statements have stirred tensions on both sides of the political spectrum, with critics arguing that the move undermines efforts to create more equitable systems, while his supporters praise the move as a return to “common sense” governance.
The Specter of Agency Closures and a Smaller Government
Trump’s rhetoric extends beyond cultural issues into the very structure of government. His bold promise to close entire government agencies, ostensibly to shrink the federal bureaucracy and curb spending, raises alarm bells in Washington. Proposals to slash or completely eliminate agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Education, and others present a clear vision of a leaner, more “efficient” government. But this raises critical questions about the long-term implications for public services, the environment, and American citizens who rely on these services.
Equally concerning is the shadow of Elon Musk, whose increasing political influence could add a new layer of complexity to the American landscape. As one of the wealthiest individuals in the world, Musk’s increasing control over critical sectors such as space, technology, and energy is stirring debate about his growing power. In particular, Musk’s political maneuverings and his potential power grab in the political and economic spheres are raising concerns about the future of American democracy. Will Musk’s influence exacerbate the wealth divide and further concentrate power in the hands of a few? Or will his innovative spirit lead to a new era of technological advancement and economic growth?
Racial Tensions and Trump’s Inauguration
Perhaps the most unsettling issue of all, however, is the growing racial divide in the United States. The divisions exposed during Trump’s inauguration—marked by protests, violence, and accusations of racial loyalty among performers—illustrate the deep fissures in American society. The controversy surrounding the selection of Black performers for the inaugural ceremony, and the subsequent accusations that these artists were betraying their own communities, underscores a larger issue: race relations in the United States remain fraught and highly politicized. Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric on race and his approach to Black communities during his first term, which included support for “law and order” policies that critics argue disproportionately affected African Americans, was a flashpoint for many in the nation. His second term, however, promises to bring even greater polarization, particularly with his administration’s stance on racial justice and systemic inequality.
Diplomatic and Economic Consequences
As Trump’s presidency embarks on a second term, the next steps will be critical in shaping the future of U.S. diplomacy and economic welfare. His policies will undoubtedly continue to reverberate across global markets, with ripple effects on everything from global trade agreements to foreign investments. The U.S. faces a critical juncture, with decisions that will define its place in a rapidly changing world order. Will Trump’s hardline approach strengthen American economic power and national security, or will it alienate key allies and disrupt the delicate balance of international relations?
The United States is at a crossroads. Whether it’s the ongoing war in Gaza, the looming economic threats posed by trade wars, or the racial and political divisions that have marred the nation’s identity, the road ahead will be fraught with challenges. In an increasingly globalized world, America’s next steps are more critical than ever. The way forward must strike a delicate balance between securing American interests, preserving global alliances, and fostering domestic unity. How the new administration navigates these turbulent waters will determine the long-term stability and prosperity of the nation.
Left, Right, or Wrong?
Stricter abortion restrictions, the January 6 Capitol riot, and a rise in racially motivated violence—these are just some of the indicators of the far-right’s growing power and visibility in the United States. And while Trump plays a significant role, the movement’s success is not solely his doing. The radical right has embedded itself deeply within the nation’s political fabric, leveraging social divisions, fostering instability, and pushing democracy to the brink as part of a broader strategy leading up to the 2024 election.
The rise of the ultra-conservative faction is the result of a carefully orchestrated campaign launched over four decades ago by a determined minority intent on reshaping the country’s power structure. This movement has methodically advanced its agenda in plain sight, often underestimated or dismissed. Its efforts have culminated in a firm grip on key institutions, with Trump serving as a catalyst for its rapid acceleration. His influence has ensured that the Supreme Court is now under the control of hardline conservatives, and the movement’s momentum shows no sign of slowing. Trump’s return to the presidency stands as a significant milestone in this ongoing political transformation.
Foreign BAND-AID
At the center of the debate is Trump’s insistence that foreign aid should serve as a direct bargaining chip rather than an open-ended commitment to diplomacy and development. His administration has slashed funding for initiatives that have long supported impoverished nations, instead steering resources toward military alliances and countries that align with his "America First" doctrine. Critics argue the move risks destabilizing regions that rely on U.S. aid for health programs, education, and infrastructure, while supporters claim it eliminates waste and forces foreign governments to take more responsibility for their own progress.
During the hearing, lawmakers grilled administration officials over the reasoning behind the cuts, with Democrats warning that the approach abandons America’s leadership role in global affairs. Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) accused the White House of turning aid into a “pay-to-play system,” while Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), though generally supportive of the administration’s policies, expressed concern that gutting aid to key allies could backfire. “We can’t just walk away from the commitments we’ve made,” McCaul cautioned.
Sensors Censored Since
This intensifying clash between the press and political power will take center stage at a series of discussions this new America, where speakers will explore the impact of these developments on journalistic freedom. They’ll address whether mounting political pressure has already led newsrooms and sources to censor themselves and what legal protections exist for journalists navigating an increasingly hostile landscape.
Among the voices leading the conversation are David Loy, Legal Director of the First Amendment Coalition, Zach Press, senior staff attorney with Lawyers for Reporters at the Cyrus R. Vance Center for International Justice, and Joel Simon, founding director of the Journalism Protection Initiative at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism in New York City. These experts will weigh in on how reporters can safeguard their rights and what steps media organizations can take to push back against government overreach.
“The press is meant to serve as a check on power,” said Loy, emphasizing the constitutional protections afforded to journalists. “When the government exerts pressure to silence coverage, democracy itself is at risk.”
Trump, Black Culture, and the Inauguration Controversy
Donald Trump’s second inauguration was always destined to be a flashpoint, but few expected it to divide Black entertainers as starkly as it did. Hip-hop icons like Snoop Dogg and Nelly faced intense backlash after agreeing to perform at the event, with many in the Black community accusing them of selling out for a paycheck.
The moment symbolized a larger cultural rift—one between older Black entertainers who view political affiliations as transactional and younger activists who see Trump as an existential threat to Black progress. Even among Black conservatives, there is debate over Trump’s legacy in the community. While some point to criminal justice reform and economic opportunities, others cite his inflammatory rhetoric and policies that disproportionately affected Black Americans.
This tension underscores a broader identity crisis within Black America. The cultural dominance of hip-hop—once an anti-establishment movement—is now being tested by political realities that demand harder choices than just beats and rhymes.
LIFESTYLE(S) AND CULTURE(S)
As America marches into 2025 under the newly re-elected President Donald Trump, the country finds itself in the throes of a cultural reckoning. From the creeping presence of surveillance capitalism to the disintegration of traditional urban life, the social landscape is shifting beneath the feet of its citizens. The rise of AI-driven technology, the ban on TikTok, the OnlyFans phenomenon, and the slow decay of once-thriving metropolises like San Francisco are forcing Americans to redefine success, privacy, and even their own self-worth.
The Meta Thought Police: A New Era of Surveillance?
In a stunning technological leap, Meta has unveiled its groundbreaking neural interface, capable of reading a user's thoughts with an unprecedented 80% accuracy. What was once the stuff of science fiction is now a reality—users can navigate the digital world with mere thoughts, but at what cost? Privacy experts warn that this technology is the first step toward a full-blown Orwellian state, where corporations and governments alike can monitor thoughts before they even become actions.
The implications are staggering. Already, there are reports that Meta is working with law enforcement agencies to "flag" potential threats based on subconscious thought patterns. The company insists the technology is opt-in and meant to "enhance digital experiences," but critics argue this is the start of thought crime enforcement—a future where even private dissent becomes impossible.
The TikTok Ban and Social Media Panic
For years, TikTok was an unshakeable pillar of American youth culture. That all changed in late 2024 when, citing national security risks, the U.S. government officially banned the Chinese-owned platform from the American market. The response was instant and chaotic. Millions of influencers saw their livelihoods disappear overnight. TikTok stars scrambled to migrate to Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, but the damage was done—their audiences, built over years, vanished in an instant.
Beyond economic concerns, the ban sparked a larger cultural panic. Have Americans become too reliant on social media? Studies emerging in late 2024 showed a direct correlation between excessive social media use and increased anxiety, depression, and attention disorders, particularly in Gen Z. The removal of TikTok forced many to reevaluate their digital dependencies. For some, it was a wake-up call; for others, it was simply another sign that the government was exerting more control over the internet, a move that eerily mirrors restrictions in China and Russia.
The OnlyFans Phenomenon and the Degradation of Feminism
Once dismissed as a niche platform for adult content, OnlyFans has exploded into a multibillion-dollar industry—and, some argue, a symbol of modern female disempowerment masquerading as liberation. Initially heralded as a way for women to "take control of their own bodies and finances," OnlyFans has morphed into something darker.
Critics argue that the platform has normalized hyper-sexualization and led to a devaluation of women's roles in society beyond their physical appeal. More concerning is the demographic shift—where the site was once dominated by seasoned adult entertainers, it’s now flooded with young women barely out of high school, many of whom turn to online sex work as a means of financial survival.
This growing trend has reignited feminist debates over whether platforms like OnlyFans are truly empowering or just another way for women to be commodified under the guise of "choice." One thing is certain: the new digital economy is reshaping social dynamics at an unprecedented rate, and not everyone is happy with the results.
The Death of Coastal Elites and the Rise of Nomadic Living
For decades, cities like San Francisco and Seattle were seen as the pinnacle of American prosperity—hubs of innovation, wealth, and progressive values. Today, they are symbols of urban decay. Once-thriving business districts now stand half-empty, riddled with crime, drug addiction, and homelessness. Tech workers and young professionals are fleeing in droves, swapping sky-high rents for minimalist, mobile lifestyles.
The rise of tiny home and car-living culture is no longer just an aesthetic choice—it’s an economic necessity. Van life influencers paint the movement as a romantic escape from the grind, but beneath the Instagram filters lies a stark reality: many Americans can no longer afford stable housing, even with full-time jobs.
Meanwhile, conservative-led states like Texas and Florida are experiencing a population boom, benefiting from California’s exodus. But whether these migrants will embrace the politics of their new homes or clash with them remains to be seen. The question now is: Are we witnessing the slow death of the American metropolis?
A Nation in Transition
As 2025 unfolds, America is undergoing a cultural metamorphosis. Technology is encroaching on mental autonomy, social media is losing its grip, and economic realities are forcing a return to simpler, if more precarious, ways of living. The country is at a crossroads where privacy, identity, and tradition are all being renegotiated in real time.
One thing is clear: the America of 2025 is not the America of a decade ago. Whether these changes lead to a renaissance or a collapse remains an open question.
Zuckerburg, Maybe...
Observers have pointed to his seemingly altered physical appearance, from a more chiseled jawline to an almost eerily smooth complexion. A 2023 Forbes report highlighted Meta’s work with AI-generated avatars and facial reconstruction technology, leading some theorists to question whether Zuckerberg’s own face is being digitally manipulated in real time.
Of course, skeptics dismiss the theory as an absurd mix of deepfake paranoia and good old-fashioned internet hysteria. Experts in biotechnology, such as Dr. Michael Stevens from MIT’s Media Lab, argue that while neurotech is advancing rapidly, the idea that Zuckerberg is secretly transforming into some post-human entity is “pure science fiction.” Meanwhile, a Washington Post investigation into Meta’s projects found no evidence that Zuckerberg has personally undergone any kind of enhancement.
Still, the internet remains unconvinced. With Meta at the forefront of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and neural interfacing, some believe the company's CEO may be far more than just an advocate—he may be the prototype. Whether this is just another bizarre online hoax or a glimpse into the future of human augmentation, one thing is certain: the Zuckerberg conspiracy isn’t going away anytime soon.
ICE HEATS UP
San Francisco – Bay Area radio station KCBS is caught in the crosshairs of an FCC investigation following its January 26 coverage of ICE operations in San Jose, a move that places the station’s broadcasting license in jeopardy. Meanwhile, the Associated Press revealed that one of its reporters was denied White House access after refusing to comply with President Donald Trump’s executive mandate to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.” These incidents add to a growing list of confrontations between Trump and major media outlets, many of which faced legal battles with him even before his first term.
Among the voices leading the conversation are David Loy, Legal Director of the First Amendment Coalition, Zach Press, senior staff attorney with Lawyers for Reporters at the Cyrus R. Vance Center for International Justice, and Joel Simon, founding director of the Journalism Protection Initiative at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism in New York City. These experts will weigh in on how reporters can safeguard their rights and what steps media organizations can take to push back against government overreach.
Shanghai Swan Song
A Covid-19 outbreak in Shanghai has resulted in over 22,000 new infections within a single day, leading Chinese authorities to impose a strict lockdown as part of the country’s zero-Covid strategy. The financial hub, home to millions, has come under increasingly severe restrictions, with residents confined to their homes and mass testing underway. Reports from the city describe growing frustration over food shortages, limited medical access, and the mental toll of prolonged isolation.
Shocking videos have emerged from Shanghai, capturing the desperation of those struggling under the restrictions. Footage circulating online shows residents protesting from their balconies, overwhelmed medical staff, and enforcement measures that have sparked concerns over human rights violations. The lockdown is among the most stringent imposed in China since the start of the pandemic, raising questions about the long-term viability of the government’s zero-tolerance approach.
Bitcoin’s Renaissance and the Global Currency Conspiracy
For years, Bitcoin was written off as a fringe asset, dismissed by mainstream economists as a bubble waiting to burst. But as of late 2024, Bitcoin has skyrocketed past $100,000 per coin, riding a wave of bullish sentiment fueled by distrust in traditional banking and whispers of an impending global financial system reset.
The financial elite—those same institutions that mocked Bitcoin just a decade ago—are now quietly investing in it. BlackRock, JPMorgan, and other corporate behemoths have begun hoarding crypto assets, leading to speculation that Bitcoin’s rise isn’t just about decentralized finance anymore—it’s about something bigger.
Enter the Unified Global Currency theory, a once-dismissed conspiracy now gaining mainstream traction. The idea? That world governments, in coordination with financial giants, are working toward a single digital currency, replacing traditional national currencies in an effort to centralize financial control under a select few.
The World Economic Forum has already floated the idea of a “universal digital ledger”—a system where every transaction, across every nation, is trackable and controllable. For Bitcoin maximalists, this is the ultimate nightmare—a cashless society where governments and corporations dictate how and where you can spend your money.
For now, Bitcoin’s rise signals one thing clearly: trust in traditional finance is eroding, and more people are seeking alternatives. But whether Bitcoin remains the currency of the people or is co-opted into something more dystopian remains to be seen.
BU$INESS AND FINAN¢E
As 2025 dawns, the global financial landscape is in flux, shaped by unprecedented deregulation, a tech billionaire’s stranglehold on global internet access, and a looming financial revolution that has both Wall Street elites and tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists gripping their seats. The air is thick with speculation—is the world barreling toward a single global currency? Is Marvel’s cinematic empire on the verge of collapse? Is the NBA hemorrhaging fans at an unsustainable rate?
The economy is riding an unsteady high, with an increasingly bullish attitude toward Bitcoin, while regulatory rollbacks threaten to erode consumer protections that once kept corporate greed in check. At the center of it all? A handful of mega-corporations and figures like Elon Musk, whose growing dominance over essential infrastructure raises questions about whether we’re witnessing the birth of an unelected corporate government.
Starlink and the Birth of the Musk Internet State
Elon Musk’s Starlink has transcended being just a satellite internet provider—it is now an essential piece of global infrastructure, with over 8,000 satellites orbiting Earth, providing high-speed connectivity to regions once untouched by modern telecommunications. In just five years, Starlink has gone from an ambitious side project to a geo-political weapon wielded by Musk himself.
The Ukraine-Russia war exposed just how indispensable Starlink had become when Musk was caught in the middle of a geopolitical firestorm, accused of deliberately shutting off Starlink coverage in Crimea to prevent Ukrainian forces from gaining a battlefield advantage. This set off alarm bells among world leaders: why does a single man have the power to turn off the internet for an entire nation?
It’s not just about war. Starlink is effectively privatizing the internet, with Musk holding the keys. While traditional ISPs are still bogged down by government regulations, Musk has maneuvered his way around them, creating an entirely separate global, unregulated digital ecosystem. In some remote parts of the world, Starlink is the only internet—a scenario that puts Musk in control of an entire planet’s digital communication.
And now, whispers in Washington suggest Starlink could soon be declared a public utility, a move that would bring it under federal oversight. But Musk, ever the renegade, has preemptively responded with his own decentralized internet project, promising “uncensorable” global connectivity. This has only fueled conspiracy theories that Musk is building his own parallel nation-state in cyberspace.
The End of the Marvel Era?
For years, the Marvel Cinematic Universe was an unstoppable force, with every release minting money at the box office. But 2024 was the year the empire finally cracked. Disney’s once-bulletproof franchise saw back-to-back box office failures, with even core fans walking away from what they once considered appointment cinema.
The warning signs had been there for years—overstuffed CGI spectacles, uninspired storytelling, and an over-reliance on nostalgia. But the real killer? Superhero fatigue. What was once a genre-defining movement has become a bloated, self-parodying mess, unable to replicate the cultural lightning-in-a-bottle success of Avengers: Endgame.
And the numbers prove it. Marvel’s latest releases in 2024—The Marvels: Rise Again and Eternals 2—posted some of the worst opening weekends in the studio’s history, and Disney executives are now in full-blown panic mode.
The irony? Hollywood’s overreliance on superhero films has created a vacuum where original storytelling barely exists. As Marvel continues its desperate attempt to reclaim cultural relevance, studios are finally being forced to rethink their approach—and audiences might finally be ready for something new.
The Deregulation Avalanche: Are Consumers Losing Their Last Protections?
Trump’s second term has brought with it a wave of deregulation, stripping back decades of consumer protections under the banner of “free market innovation.”
One of the biggest casualties? Consumer credit protections. New policies have removed caps on interest rates, allowing banks and credit card companies to push APRs to near-predatory levels. Similarly, food safety standards have been relaxed, leading to fears that the FDA’s oversight of major food suppliers is weakening.
Tech companies, too, have benefited. Privacy laws that once held Silicon Valley accountable for data misuse are being rolled back, paving the way for aggressive data harvesting practices that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.
For corporations, this is a golden age of unchecked capitalism. For consumers? It’s a minefield of exploitative practices with little recourse.
The NBA’s Slow Death
For the NBA, 2024 was a year of uncomfortable truths. Once the crown jewel of American sports, the league is facing an existential crisis: declining TV ratings, dwindling fan engagement, and a growing sentiment that basketball, as a product, is simply worse than it was a decade ago.
The reasons are plenty:
- Load management has turned regular season games into meaningless filler, with star players frequently sitting out.
- Sky-high ticket prices have alienated working-class fans.
- An over-reliance on three-point shooting has made the game feel repetitive and robotic.
Even worse? The rise of European superstars like Victor Wembanyama and Luka Dončić has reignited an uncomfortable question: Has American basketball peaked?
At a time when the NFL and international soccer are growing, the NBA is struggling to stay relevant. If things don’t change, the league could be headed for a slow, painful decline into irrelevance.
The Financial Crossroads of 2025
Between deregulation, technological monopolization, and the slow erosion of traditional finance, the American economy is at a crossroads. The ultra-rich are consolidating more power than ever, while consumers find themselves increasingly at the mercy of an economy that serves corporations before people.
The question isn’t just whether Bitcoin will replace the dollar, or if Marvel can resurrect itself, or if the NBA can recapture its former magic. The question is: Is the economy still working for the average person?
As we enter 2025, the answer feels more uncertain than ever.
Keep on Leanin' on Elon
Unlike traditional internet providers that rely on fiber-optic cables or ground-based cell towers, Starlink operates through a vast constellation of small satellites orbiting Earth at low altitudes—roughly 340 to 1,200 kilometers above the planet. This is a stark contrast to older satellite internet systems, which relied on geostationary satellites positioned over 35,000 kilometers away, leading to high latency and sluggish speeds.
Starlink’s lower-altitude satellites create a web of coverage, dramatically reducing lag and making real-time applications like video calls, online gaming, and high-frequency trading possible even in remote locations. Users connect via a compact satellite dish, which automatically aligns itself with passing satellites, ensuring a seamless connection with minimal downtime.
The key advantage of Starlink lies in its combination of speed, accessibility, and scalability. In areas where traditional internet infrastructure is either unreliable or nonexistent, Starlink provides a game-changing alternative. Rural communities, military operations, scientific expeditions, and even disaster response teams have all benefited from its ability to deliver stable broadband access without the need for extensive physical infrastructurerks has made it an invaluable tool in crises, as seen in Ukraine, where it provided uninterrupted communication following infrastructure attacks.
NBA Now Basically Avg.
For over two decades, the NBA revolved around LeBron James. He was the face of the league, its ultimate draw, and the only consistent storyline that mattered. But as he nears the twilight of his career, the NBA is scrambling for its next great icon. The problem? There isn’t one. While stars like Giannis Antetokounmpo, Nikola Jokić, and Jayson Tatum dominate on the court, none have captured mainstream attention like LeBron, Kobe, or Jordan before them. The league’s biggest marketing force is aging out, and nobody is ready to fill his shoes.
Then there’s the three-point revolution, spearheaded by none other than Stephen Curry. His impact on the game is undeniable, but what was once a beautiful evolution has now become an obsession. The modern NBA has been reduced to a barrage of deep threes, with players at every position attempting to mimic Curry’s otherworldly shooting ability—without his actual skill. The result? Ugly, one-dimensional basketball. Gone are the days of mid-range artistry, post battles, and diverse play styles. Instead, teams live and die by the three, making the game predictable and, frankly, boring. What was once a skill is now a curse, and Curry’s influence may have unintentionally doomed the sport he helped redefine.
It's a Bird! It's a Plane Jane!
Perhaps the biggest complaint from disillusioned fans is the noticeable decline of the traditional male superhero. Thor, once a godly warrior, was reduced to comic relief in Thor: Love and Thunder. The Hulk, a longtime fan favorite, was sidelined in favor of She-Hulk. Even new male heroes, like the much-hyped Shang-Chi, failed to leave a lasting impact, overshadowed by the studio’s aggressive push for gender-affirming, commercially tailored female leads.
All of this has contributed to Marvel’s identity crisis. What was once a franchise built on mythic, aspirational heroes has morphed into a corporate lecture series, leaving many fans feeling disconnected. Box office receipts reflect this shift — Marvel films that once dominated now struggle to break even, and Disney’s once-invincible brand is losing steam.
The question now is whether Marvel can course-correct. Will it return to the high-stakes, character-driven storytelling that made it a global phenomenon, or will it double down on its current trajectory, hoping that the next wave of audiences embraces the new direction? If recent trends are any indication, the magic that made the MCU great may already be gone.
The Academy Awards: A Dinosaur in the Age of Streaming
Once the grandest night in Hollywood, the Academy Awards limped into 2024 with an air of irrelevance. The March 10 ceremony marked a historic low in viewership, with ratings dropping below 10 million for the first time in its history. For an institution that once commanded national attention, the decline had been slow but inevitable.
The problem wasn’t just declining interest in award shows; it was a fundamental disconnect between the Oscars and the people they were meant to represent. The Best Picture winner, a slow-burn European drama with limited distribution, grossed a mere $15 million worldwide. Meanwhile, the biggest box office hits of the year—nearly all horror films—were snubbed entirely.
Audiences had spoken. Prestige cinema, as the Academy defined it, no longer held sway over the public. Streaming had redefined entertainment consumption, social media dictated what was worth talking about, and the Oscars found themselves left behind. The ceremony itself, once an extravagant display of Hollywood glamour, now felt like a relic, watched out of obligation rather than excitement.
By the time the final award of the night was announced, it was clear that the Oscars no longer dictated cultural relevance. That power had shifted elsewhere—to streaming, to viral moments, and to an audience that had outgrown Hollywood’s self-importance.
As 2025 loomed, the entertainment industry faced an unavoidable truth: the old world of music and film was crumbling. Hip-hop’s giants were facing reckoning, horror was keeping theaters alive, and the Oscars were fading into irrelevance. The only question that remained was whether Hollywood could adapt—or whether it would be left behind altogether.
ART AND ENTERTAINMENT
Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Misfire: When a GOAT Gets Ghosted by Middle America
On February 11, 2024, inside the glittering confines of Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas, Kendrick Lamar took the stage for what should have been a defining moment in his career. The Super Bowl halftime show, once a proving ground for legends, had seen hip-hop ascend to its rightful place in the pantheon of American entertainment, culminating in Dr. Dre’s 2022 spectacle that featured Lamar alongside Eminem, Snoop Dogg, and 50 Cent. Yet, when Lamar stepped into the spotlight as the sole headliner two years later, the reception was colder than the February desert night outside the stadium.
The problem wasn’t talent—Lamar remains one of the most critically lauded artists of his generation. The problem was the audience. His setlist, dominated by politically charged anthems like “Alright” and “The Heart Part 5,” clashed with an event designed for maximum broad appeal. While his fans praised the performance as high art, the broader Super Bowl viewership—a mix of casual music fans, die-hard football enthusiasts, and the corporate advertising machine—found it alienating. Within minutes of his closing track, social media was ablaze with critiques, not of his skill, but of the mood his set cast over an audience expecting something more celebratory.
The halftime show had always been a delicate balancing act between artistry and populism. Prince electrified a rain-soaked Miami in 2007 with a career-spanning set. Beyoncé commanded the field with an energy that blended Black power and mass-market appeal. Even Usher, the previous year’s performer, won over the crowd with a slick, nostalgia-infused spectacle. Lamar, by contrast, seemed unwilling to compromise, delivering a show more suited for an art gallery than a football stadium.
For Middle America, this wasn’t the Kendrick they wanted. Hip-hop, once the dominant cultural force across all demographics, was beginning to show cracks in its universal appeal. Country and pop crossover acts like Morgan Wallen, Luke Combs, and even Post Malone—who pivoted hard into country—were pulling the kind of numbers that rap artists could no longer match outside of their core fanbase. Lamar’s performance wasn’t just a Super Bowl misfire; it was a signal that hip-hop’s era of unchecked mainstream dominance might finally be leveling out.
Jay-Z and the Allegations That Won’t Go Away
As the rap world reeled from Kendrick Lamar’s miscalculated Super Bowl moment, its most powerful figure faced an entirely different crisis. On April 3, 2024, a lawsuit was formally filed in a New York court, alleging that Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter had engaged in an inappropriate sexual relationship with an underage girl in 2000. The case, which had long circulated in conspiracy theory circles online, suddenly took on new weight as legal documents surfaced, pointing to an effort by the plaintiff—now a woman in her forties—to take the case to trial.
For Jay-Z, the implications were seismic. Since transitioning from rapper to billionaire businessman, he had positioned himself as the elder statesman of hip-hop, the mogul who had outgrown the trappings of the industry and reshaped his narrative as a cultural leader. His marriage to Beyoncé, his Roc Nation empire, and his deep entrenchment in corporate America had rendered him nearly untouchable. But in 2024, even the most powerful names in entertainment were no longer immune to scrutiny.
Jay-Z’s legal team responded aggressively, dismissing the allegations as an attempt to extort money from one of the richest men in music. But the damage had already been done. Within weeks, whispers of his potential cancellation began circulating. Hip-hop, a genre once fiercely protective of its own, was no longer shielding its giants from accountability. Streaming numbers for Jay-Z’s catalog saw an initial dip before recovering, but the headlines refused to die. In an industry built on reputation and legacy, even unproven accusations could leave an irreversible stain.
The fallout extended beyond Jay-Z himself. The broader hip-hop industry, already in the midst of an identity crisis, now faced a reckoning. If Jay-Z, the genre’s most respected elder, could be dragged into scandal, who was next? The case had yet to go to trial, but the court of public opinion had already begun deliberations.
Horror Movies: Hollywood’s Last Bankable Genre
As superhero fatigue officially took hold in 2024, Hollywood found itself in a financial freefall. Studios that once relied on Marvel and DC to keep them afloat were now scrambling for viable alternatives. Every major tentpole release outside of “Deadpool & Wolverine” flopped, leaving one unexpected genre to carry the industry on its back: horror.
The numbers didn’t lie. On March 8, “Smile 2” hit theaters and pulled in a staggering $200 million worldwide, more than doubling its predecessor’s take. In May, the ultra-violent “Terrifier 3” became the highest-grossing slasher film of all time, proving that even niche horror franchises could out-earn supposed blockbusters. Jordan Peele’s latest psychological thriller, released in October, cemented his status as the modern Hitchcock. Even more shocking was the entry of former President Barack Obama into the horror arena—his production company, Higher Ground, released “His Father’s Son,” a politically charged horror-thriller that became a surprise box office hit, proving that even the 44th President of the United States saw where Hollywood’s future was headed.
The reason for horror’s dominance was simple: it delivered what audiences wanted. At a time when franchises had become bloated and formulaic, horror offered originality, emotion, and, most importantly, profitability. Made on shoestring budgets, these films were raking in returns that Hollywood executives had once reserved for billion-dollar superhero sagas.
If there was one lesson to take from 2024, it was this: horror wasn’t just surviving—it was taking over.
The Fall of Late-Night TV: A Genre on Life Support
For decades, late-night television was the pulse of American pop culture, a nightly ritual that bridged generations and defined water-cooler conversations. From Johnny Carson to David Letterman to the viral-era dominance of Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert, the format thrived by adapting to the times. But as 2024 drew to a close, it became painfully clear that late-night was no longer just in decline—it was dying in real time.
The numbers were brutal. NBC’s The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, once the crown jewel of the format, saw its lowest ratings in history, averaging just over a million viewers per night—a far cry from the eight million it commanded in the early 2010s. CBS, once Colbert’s stronghold, announced budget cuts that slashed the production staff of The Late Show by nearly half. ABC, sensing the inevitable, began discussions about whether Jimmy Kimmel Live! would even continue past 2025.
The reason for the collapse was obvious: audiences had moved on. In an era where every punchline and interview clip was instantly available on social media, there was no reason to stay up past midnight to watch an aging host recite monologue jokes about yesterday’s news. The format, once a necessary fixture of entertainment, now felt like a relic—a vestige of a time when cable television still dictated cultural relevance.
Worse, the hosts themselves had become predictable. Where once they were risk-takers, now they were corporate-friendly political commentators, cycling through the same tired jokes about Trump, Biden, and whatever controversy was dominating Twitter that week. The rebellious, unscripted energy that defined the genre in its golden years was gone, replaced by sanitized celebrity interviews and overly rehearsed skits designed more for YouTube than actual television.
Even Saturday Night Live, the longest-running bastion of late-night comedy, struggled to find its place. The November 2024 presidential election should have provided a goldmine of material, but instead, the show limped through a season with little buzz, overshadowed by independent online comedians and TikTok personalities who were shaping the political satire landscape in real time.
The final death knell came in December, when Warner Bros. Discovery announced the cancellation of Late Night with Seth Meyers, citing declining ratings and an unsustainable budget. It was the first major late-night casualty, but it wouldn’t be the last.
As 2025 approached, the message was clear: late-night television, once a cultural institution, had lost its purpose. The internet had replaced it, and no amount of rebranding, new hosts, or desperate viral attempts would bring it back. The only question remaining was who would be the last host standing—and whether anyone would still be watching.
Late Night, Lame Ducks
The numbers tell the story. Late-night shows that once drew millions of loyal viewers every night are now struggling to stay above a million total. In 1993, The Tonight Show with Jay Leno regularly attracted over five million nightly viewers. By contrast, in 2023, Jimmy Fallon’s version of The Tonight Show barely managed to reach 1.3 million on a good night. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel Live! haven’t fared much better. These ratings pale in comparison not just to their predecessors but to nearly every form of digital entertainment available today.
One of the biggest reasons for late-night’s decline is obvious: the internet. The rise of YouTube, streaming services, and short-form content on TikTok and Instagram has completely changed how people consume entertainment. Why wait until 11:30 PM for a monologue when you can watch a five-minute clip on YouTube the next morning? The best parts of these shows—celebrity interviews and comedy sketches—are chopped up and uploaded online, removing any incentive to watch live.
Beyond that, younger audiences simply don’t care about traditional TV anymore. Late-night’s core demographic has historically been working adults looking for a lighthearted way to end their day. But that audience now has Netflix, podcasts, and endless social media content at their fingertips, making a scheduled, hour-long TV show feel outdated.
Madonna Mayhem Still
We had to show that, sorry. Anyway HERE is the real story. It was a free event to end a successful world tour of more than 80 shows on 5 continents, set of the bustling beach metropolis of Rio De Janiero, a stretch nearly 2 miles, a song system to fill the ears of all within 5 miles... The video highlights a historic music event featuring pop icon Madonna, who delivered an unforgettable performance at Brazil's famous Copacabana Beach. As the final show of her highly successful Celebration Tour, which spanned more than 80 shows across five continents, Madonna captivated a massive crowd with her electrifying presence. The concert, set against the backdrop of Rio de Janeiro's bustling beach, covered nearly two miles and was audible up to five miles away. Known as "The Material Girl," Madonna dazzled her fans with numerous costume and set changes, performing hits from her impressive 40-year career. The event marked a fitting and spectacular conclusion to her worldwide tour, solidifying her status as a legendary performer.
1 P, 1 A, 1 T... $ Billions
A Hollywood fixture, who at one time in fact challenged the likes of Leno, Hall, and Letterman for the throne of Late Night king, this video delves into the dark side of Hollywood's power dynamics, focusing on allegations against Pat Sajak. a prominent figure in the industry, who is accused of exploiting his influence within Hollywood’s corrupt social and economic system. The video suggests that Pat abused his position, taking advantage of individuals, including Vanna, who is portrayed as a victim of sexual exploitation due to his status as the irreplaceable "go-to" person on the popular TV series, Wheel of Fortune. The tribute so to say criticizes Hollywood for its immense control over careers, where crossing the wrong people can end one's career, and highlights how the industry prioritized profits over moral integrity. It suggests that Vanna and possibly others were subjected to exploitation, reflecting a broader issue of powerful individuals using their status to satisfy their desires, a problem that has persisted for decades within Hollywood and other centers of power. You can watch Pat's last episode at The Wheel, HERE.
FEATURED:
Birges' Casino
The documentary delves into the intricacies of the 1980 Harvey’s Casino Bombing, a meticulously planned extortion attempt that remains one of the most sophisticated heists in American history. On August 26, 1980, John Birges Sr., a financially struggling gambler with a background in engineering, planted a bomb inside Harvey’s Resort Hotel in Stateline, Nevada. The explosive device, disguised as a metal box and containing nearly 1,000 pounds of dynamite, was rigged with an anti-tampering mechanism, making it nearly impossible to disarm. Birges demanded a ransom of $3 million from the casino, threatening total destruction if his demands were not met.
Federal and local authorities, including the FBI and bomb disposal experts, spent hours attempting to disable the device. Ultimately, on August 27, an attempted controlled detonation failed, resulting in a massive explosion that destroyed two floors of the casino but miraculously caused no fatalities. The investigation into the attack spanned months, eventually leading to Birges' arrest in 1981 after a tip from his own sons. He was convicted in 1982 and sentenced to life in prison without parole. He remained incarcerated until his death in 1996.
The documentary presents a detailed reconstruction of the events, highlighting the extensive law enforcement efforts and judicial proceedings that followed. It distinguishes itself from other true crime explorations, such as LEMMiNO’s DB Cooper investigation, by focusing on the complex mechanics of the crime and the procedural challenges faced by investigators and prosecutors.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.